Opinion
Submitted March 20, 1889
Decided April 16, 1889
Edmund B. Wynn for appellant.
A. Walker Otis for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Bowles v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1889
113 N.Y. 643 (N.Y. 1889)
Summaries of
Bowles v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1889
113 N.Y. 643 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for
Bowles v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co.
Case Details
Full title:JAMES R. BOWLES, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v . THE ROME…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 16, 1889
Citations
113 N.Y. 643 (N.Y. 1889)
Citing Cases
Ruppel v. Clayes
Jones on Evidence, sec. 137; Galveston Ry. v. Smith (Tex.), 24 S.W. 668; Russell v. Hearns, 113 N.C. 361;…
Jones v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Statements made in argument to the jury of an alleged fact of which there is no evidence is reversible error.…