From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bower v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1939
23 N.E.2d 460 (N.Y. 1939)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1939

Decided October 30, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, McNAUGHT, J.

Gerald S. Hewitt for appellants.

Louis R. Dowd and Horace L. Bronson for respondent.


The trial court charged "that those seven cows were of the value and cost him [plaintiff] $920, that they sold for $110 and that his [plaintiff's] pecuniary damages is the difference of $810." The cows in question cost plaintiff $920 in October, 1936. The injury to those cows occurred in May, 1938.

In this action to recover damages growing out of defendant's fraud, plaintiff's measure of damage was the actual pecuniary loss sustained as a direct result of the wrong. That was the difference in value of the cows in May, 1938, before the wrong, and their value thereafter, not their value in October, 1936, eighteen months before the injury, and their value thereafter.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants to abide the event.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur O'BRIEN, J., taking no part.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Bower v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1939
23 N.E.2d 460 (N.Y. 1939)
Case details for

Bower v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTUS BOWER, Respondent, v. FRED L. PALMER et al., Doing Business under…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 30, 1939

Citations

23 N.E.2d 460 (N.Y. 1939)
23 N.E.2d 460

Citing Cases

Park v. Chessin

In Piper the tort (fraud) had merely to do with the right of inheritance, that is, to declare defendant a…

Oxenfeldt v. Yonofsky

Nevertheless, the trial court charged the jury that if plaintiff was entitled to recover he must be awarded…