From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Citibank, N.A.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 3, 2014
No. 63282 (Nev. Nov. 3, 2014)

Opinion

No. 63282

11-03-2014

BOURNE VALLEY COURT TRUST, Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A.; AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II TRUST 2007-AR6, MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-AR6; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION; AND JULIANA GUEVARA, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss in a quiet title action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

The district court granted respondents' motion to dismiss, finding that Bourne Valley Court Trust had failed to state a viable claim for relief because NRS 116.3116(2)'s superpriority provision "creates a limited super priority lien for 9 months of HOA assessments leading up to the foreclosure of the first mortgage, but it does not eliminate the first security interest." This court's recent disposition in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ___, 334 P.3d 408 (2014), decides that a common-interest community association's NRS 116.3116(2) superpriority lien has true priority over a first security interest, and the association may nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. The district court's decision thus was based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND for proceedings consistent with this order.

/s/_________, J.

Pickering

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ___, 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge

Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.

Smith Larsen & Wixom

McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Citibank, N.A.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 3, 2014
No. 63282 (Nev. Nov. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:BOURNE VALLEY COURT TRUST, Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A.; AS TRUSTEE FOR…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 3, 2014

Citations

No. 63282 (Nev. Nov. 3, 2014)