From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 19, 1941
127 N.J.L. 226 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Argued May 21, 1941 —

Decided September 19, 1941.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 126 N.J.L. 112.

For the appellant, George W. Babcock.

For the respondents, David T. Wilentz, Attorney-General, and Milton, McNulty Augelli.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — PERSKIE, J. 1.


Summaries of

Borough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 19, 1941
127 N.J.L. 226 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Borough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals

Case Details

Full title:THE BOROUGH OF ORADELL, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 19, 1941

Citations

127 N.J.L. 226 (N.J. 1941)
21 A.2d 738

Citing Cases

Ocean Cty. v. Dover TP

No facts were submitted to the court explaining why the efforts of the assessor to ascertain the nature of…

Manczak v. Dover TP

A review of the history of the correction of errors statute is necessary to a proper determination of this…