From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roach v. Oakdale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jul 12, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-cv-1645 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jul. 12, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-cv-1645 SECTION P

07-12-2017

GARY BERTRAM ROACH BOP #79584-004 v. WARDEN FCI OAKDALE ET AL.


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the petitioner's objections and determining that the findings contained in the Report and Recommendation are nonetheless correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's habeas petition be and hereby is DENIED, and that the above captioned matter be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Alexandria, Louisiana, this 12th day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roach v. Oakdale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jul 12, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-cv-1645 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jul. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Roach v. Oakdale

Case Details

Full title:GARY BERTRAM ROACH BOP #79584-004 v. WARDEN FCI OAKDALE ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Jul 12, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-cv-1645 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jul. 12, 2017)

Citing Cases

Spry v. Ray

Of those ten cases, six contain the phrase in quotation marks. See Aiken v. Coleman-Medium, No.…