From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booth v. Carril

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 29, 2007
Case No. 05-72905 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2007)

Summary

holding that "routine dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies does not count as a strike"

Summary of this case from Pointer v. Wilkinson

Opinion

Case No. 05-72905.

January 29, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court has reviewed the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Defendant's Objections. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge IS HEREBY ACCEPTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's motion to revoke in forma pauperis status and dismiss without prejudice be DENIED.


Summaries of

Booth v. Carril

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 29, 2007
Case No. 05-72905 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2007)

holding that "routine dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies does not count as a strike"

Summary of this case from Pointer v. Wilkinson
Case details for

Booth v. Carril

Case Details

Full title:RODGERICK BOOTH, Plaintiff, v RUO CARRIL and RUO KELLER, in their…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 29, 2007

Citations

Case No. 05-72905 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2007)

Citing Cases

Twohig v. Riley

In Pointer v. Wilkinson, 502 F.3d 369 (6th Cir.), the Sixth Circuit held that where a complaint is dismiss in…

Pointer v. Wilkinson

Id. at 641. See, e.g., Owens v. Isaac, 487 F.3d 561, 563 (8th Cir.2007) (stating that dismissal for failure…