From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booth Chiro. Acupuncture v. State Farm Mut Auto

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51673 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

2005-1726 NC.

Decided August 22, 2006.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, Third District (Howard S. Miller, J.), dated September 26, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and LIPPMAN, JJ.


In this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the order as denied its motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly denied because plaintiff's submission of inconsistent affidavits from its treating physician raised a triable issue of fact ( see generally Amaze Med. Supply Inc. v. Eagle Ins. Co., 3 Misc 3d 130 [A], 2004 NY Slip Op 50389[U] [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists]).

Rudolph, P.J., Angiolillo and Lippman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Booth Chiro. Acupuncture v. State Farm Mut Auto

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51673 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

Booth Chiro. Acupuncture v. State Farm Mut Auto

Case Details

Full title:BOOTH CHIROPRACTIC ACUPUNCTURE PLLC A/A/O ANDRE ROSEMOND, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 22, 2006

Citations

2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51673 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)