From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bontemps v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2007
2:06-cv-2580-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)

Opinion

2:06-cv-2580-GEB-GGH-P.

August 30, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 29, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Bontemps v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2007
2:06-cv-2580-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Bontemps v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff, v. M.C. KRAMER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2007

Citations

2:06-cv-2580-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)

Citing Cases

Bontemps v. Sotak

The record reflects, however, that at least one of the dismissals cannot be characterized as having been made…

Bontemps v. Sotak

Accordingly, the court cannot conclude that any of these dismissals count as strikes. Second, defendants…