From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonefond v. Borden Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 19, 1952
12 F.R.D. 183 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

         Action by George Bonefond, incompetent, by Beatrice Bonefond, guardian ad litem, against the Borden Company, a corporation. The United States District Court for the Southern District, Weinfeld, J., denied the motions of plaintiff for production of statements of captain and crew member and for the production of investigations and reports concerning the accident.

         Order in accordance with opinion.

          Nathan Baker, New York City, for plaintiff.

          Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City, for defendant.


          WEINFELD, District Judge.

          Plaintiff has failed to show good cause for the production of the statements of the captain and the crew member requested in Item ‘ (f)’ . It appears that plaintiff's attorney has obtained statements from these witnesses. If further information is required, their depositions may be taken. In the event plaintiff is unable to obtain their depositions, he may move for the production of their statements upon a showing of good cause.

          As to Item ‘ (g)’, no claim is made that the investigations and reports concerning the accident constitute the work product of defendant's attorney. Nevertheless, good cause must be shown for their production and such showing has not been made. Were these reports made by defendant's officers in the regular course of business, their production could be demanded. But the reports sought do not fall into that category and it is well recognized that a party must prepare his own case for trial, and absent unusual circumstances, may not obtain the fruits of his adversary's trial preparations. Bifferato v. States Marine Corp., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 44. This aspect of the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal upon a showing of good cause.

         Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Bonefond v. Borden Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 19, 1952
12 F.R.D. 183 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Bonefond v. Borden Co.

Case Details

Full title:BONEFOND v. BORDEN CO.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 19, 1952

Citations

12 F.R.D. 183 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

Citing Cases

Self v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

The rule adopted and followed by the courts, therefore, denies the production of such statements where the…

Del. 1953), C. A. 1545, De Gaetano v. Frank a Clendaniel, Inc.

28 U.S.C.A. 4 Moore's Federal Practice, 2nd Ed., § 34.08; Alltmont v. U.S., 3 Cir., 177 F.2d 971. Dellameo v.…