From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bomze v. Bomze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 12, 1976
54 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 12, 1976


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 18, 1976, holding the defendant husband in contempt, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondent. Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 20, 1976, which order denied reargument, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable (Sklan v Sklan, 29 A.D.2d 526), without costs and without disbursements. The wife commenced an action for separation or, in the alternative, for a divorce. Special Term (by order of Starke, J., entered Nov. 6, 1975) granted relief to the wife pendente lite which, inter alia, provided for payments to the wife of $550 per week, effective July 8, 1975. The arrears due from July 8, 1975 through November 5, 1975 were to be paid within 15 days of service of a copy of that order with notice of entry. The order further allowed as a credit towards arrears any payments "made by the defendant directly to the plaintiff during said period" (July 8, 1975 through Nov. 5, 1975). The husband failed to pay the arrears as directed, resulting in the present order of contempt. The husband is concededly financially able to make the necessary payments and his failure to do so must be construed as willful. We note parenthetically that the credit allowed by Special Term for payments already made was in accord with the original pendente lite order.

Concur — Murphy, J.P., Birns, Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.


Summaries of

Bomze v. Bomze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 12, 1976
54 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Bomze v. Bomze

Case Details

Full title:INA-SUE BOMZE, Respondent, v. EDWARD L. BOMZE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Grand Pac. Fin. Corp. v. 97-111 Hale, LLC

also Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc. v Nachman Brach Inc., 22 Misc 3d 1109[A], 2009 NY Slip Op…

Bell v. Bell

The record further demonstrates that defendant retains the bonds that he was directed to sell, that he holds…