From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bollar v. Miller

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 30, 2009
CASE NO.: 4:09CV472 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 30, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 4:09CV472.

December 30, 2009


ORDER AND DECISION


The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge Pearson, submitted in this matter on November 20, 2009. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and Recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DISMISSED.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bollar v. Miller

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 30, 2009
CASE NO.: 4:09CV472 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Bollar v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY EARL BOLLAR, Petitioner, MICHELE MILLER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 30, 2009

Citations

CASE NO.: 4:09CV472 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Poulton v. Warden, Ross Corr. Inst.

"Errors or deficiencies in post conviction proceedings are not properly considered in habeas corpus…

Haynie v. Warden

"Errors or deficiencies in post conviction proceedings are not properly considered in habeas corpus…