From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolduc et al. v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Androscoggin
Oct 11, 1951
83 A.2d 567 (Me. 1951)

Opinion

Opinion dated October 11, 1951.

Courts. Vacation.

Frank W. Linnell, for plaintiff.

David V. Berman, for defendant.

SITTING: MURCHIE, C.J., THAXTER, FELLOWS, MERRILL, NULTY, WILLIAMSON, JJ.


Plaintiffs' exceptions to the rejection of a referee's report awarding them a recovery must be sustained on the exception which challenges the authority of the Justice of the Superior Court who ruled on the motion for the acceptance thereof, and the objections thereto, "subsequent to the vacation" following the term at which such motion and objections were presented to him for action. That the exception was waived is immaterial.

The statute authorizing decisions in vacation on matters heard during term time confers no authority beyond that period which intervenes between the adjournment of one term and the opening of another. Robinson, Appellant, 116 Me. 125, 100 A. 373; Moreland v. Vomilas, 127 Me. 493, 144 A. 652.

The case must be remanded to the Superior Court for further appropriate action therein.

Exceptions sustained.


Summaries of

Bolduc et al. v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Androscoggin
Oct 11, 1951
83 A.2d 567 (Me. 1951)
Case details for

Bolduc et al. v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LIONEL J. BOLDUC ET AL. v. GRANITE STATE FIRE INS. CO

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Androscoggin

Date published: Oct 11, 1951

Citations

83 A.2d 567 (Me. 1951)
83 A.2d 567

Citing Cases

Bolduc v. Granite State Ins. Co.

Presiding justice held plaintiffs' motion for acceptance in abeyance during the term, the succeeding…

Spear, Applt

Such decree of the Supreme Court of Probate was therefore void. The case is governed by the case of Bolduc et…