From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 3, 2002
568 S.E.2d 588 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

A01A0527.

DECIDED: JULY 3, 2002

Probation revocation. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Workman.

Gerald B. Kleinrock for appellant.

J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Elisabeth G. Macnamara, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


In Bolden v. State, 250 Ga. App. 825 ( 552 S.E.2d 533) (2001), we affirmed the trial court's order revoking Cordie Bolden's probation, holding that the court was entitled to consider her nolo contendere plea for the limited purpose of resentencing her under the first offender provisions of OCGA § 42-8-60. On certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed our decision. The Supreme Court held that under OCGA § 17-7-95 (c), a nolo contendere plea may not be used to establish that a defendant violated the terms of her probation. Accordingly, our prior opinion is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

Judgment reversed. Blackburn, C. J., Pope, P.J., Andrews, P.J., Johnson, P.J., Eldridge and Miller, J.J., concur.


DECIDED JULY 3, 2002.


Summaries of

Bolden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 3, 2002
568 S.E.2d 588 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Bolden v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOLDEN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 3, 2002

Citations

568 S.E.2d 588 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
256 Ga. App. 327

Citing Cases

Slan v. State

See OCGA § 16–8–40 ; Bills v. State, 283 Ga.App. 660, 661–662(1)(a), 642 S.E.2d 352 (2007) (robbery…

Seals v. State

" And here, Seals's challenge to his convictions based solely on conflicts in the evidence, which the jury…