From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boice v. Boice

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 15, 1952
248 P.2d 1069 (Or. 1952)

Opinion

Submitted on briefs September 9, 1952

Affirmed October 15, 1952

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, FORREST L. HUBBARD, Judge.

C.G. Schneider, of Portland, for appellant.

Millen F. Kneeland and Maurice C. Corcoran, of Portland, for respondent.


IN BANC


AFFIRMED.


Plaintiff brought action on two causes: (1) for money had and received and (2) for conversion of personal property. Defendant answered, setting up three counterclaims. Trial was had before the court without a jury. From a judgment in favor of the defendant in the amount of $500, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff's sole assignment of error reads: "In finding for defendant-respondent in the face of a total failure of proof of a contract as alleged in his counterclaim."

We find in the record no basis for evaluating this assignment.

A transcript of the testimony, certified by the court reporter but not authenticated by the trial judge, is filed but no bill of exceptions. A transcript thus certified but not authenticated is insufficient to constitute a bill of exceptions or to give the court jurisdiction to consider any question pertaining to the testimony in the case. Larsen v. Martin, 172 Or. 605, 143 P.2d 239; Wallowa Land Co. v. McGaffee, 160 Or. 298, 299, 84 P.2d 1116, and cases there cited.

In the absence of such a bill, the only questions that can be considered on appeal are the sufficiency of the pleadings, the findings of the trial court or whether the pleadings or findings support the judgment. La Grande Air Service v. Tyler et al., 193 Or. 329, 330, 237 P.2d 503, and cases there cited.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Boice v. Boice

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 15, 1952
248 P.2d 1069 (Or. 1952)
Case details for

Boice v. Boice

Case Details

Full title:BOICE v. BOICE

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 15, 1952

Citations

248 P.2d 1069 (Or. 1952)
248 P.2d 1069

Citing Cases

State v. Reyes

Harper v. Wilson, 185 Or. 23, 26, 200 P.2d 600; State v. Garner, 166 Or. 1, 5, 108 P.2d 274; State v. De…

Sheridan v. Pac. Tel. and Tel. Co.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, our consideration must be confined to the sufficiency of the…