From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bogert v. Riordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1930
230 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

October, 1930.


Order denying plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. As the plaintiff has not demanded any deficiency judgment against the defendants, a counterclaim based upon plaintiff's breach of a covenant contained in his deed may not be interposed in this action to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage. ( National Fire Ins. Co. v. McKay, 21 N.Y. 191; Merchants' Nat. Bank v. Snyder, 52 App. Div. 606; affd., 170 N.Y. 565; Lipman v. J.A.I. Works, 128 id. 58.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bogert v. Riordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1930
230 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Bogert v. Riordan

Case Details

Full title:HENRY L. BOGERT, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY RIORDAN and Others, Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1930

Citations

230 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Green Point Savings Bank v. Krokow

Whatever remedy the appellant has is in an action against his grantor on the covenant. ( Peabody v. Kent, 213…