From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bogan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 18, 1985
462 So. 2d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Summary

holding that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement

Summary of this case from Mills v. State

Opinion

Nos. 84-3, 84-4.

January 18, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and L.S. Alperstein, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James H. Dysart, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the revocation of appellant's probation in case numbers 82-7926-A and 82-10378-A, having found the evidence sufficient to support the trial court's determination that appellant committed both of the probation violations alleged. We agree with appellant's assertion, however, that the court's written order sentencing appellant to three and one-half years concurrent imprisonment on each count departs from its oral pronouncement imposing a three-year concurrent sentence on each count. Because the written judgment and sentence must not vary from the oral pronouncement, Alphonse v. State, 430 So.2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we remand this case to the trial court with directions to conform the written sentence with its oral pronouncement.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

OTT, A.C.J., FRANK, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.


Summaries of

Bogan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 18, 1985
462 So. 2d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

holding that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement

Summary of this case from Mills v. State
Case details for

Bogan v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CHARLES BOGAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 18, 1985

Citations

462 So. 2d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Yates v. State

Thus, there was a discrepancy between the oral sentence and the written sentence for which the oral sentence…

Wilson v. State

We affirm appellant's sentences, but remand to the trial court with instructions to correct the written order…