From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boatman v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 29, 2003
858 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. SC01-2571.

September 29, 2003.

Lower Tribunal No. 1D01-79.


The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See City of Miami Beach v. Mr. Samuel's Inc., 351 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1977) (stating mandamus will not lie where the respondent must exercise some discretion in making the decision); Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating mandamus "is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"). Petitioner's Motion for Final Ruling by Court with Consolidated Motion for Protective Order by the Court/Memorandum of Law is hereby denied.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Boatman v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 29, 2003
858 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2003)
Case details for

Boatman v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:RAYVON L. BOATMAN, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., ETC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 29, 2003

Citations

858 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2003)