From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Managers of Gramercy Park v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1993
190 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.).


Inasmuch as the action sounds in fraudulent misrepresentation, it had to be brought within six years of the complained of misrepresentations or two years after plaintiff discovered the fraud, whichever was later (Hernandez v Empire Mut. Ins. Co., 121 A.D.2d 259, 261). The complaint alleges that while the purportedly fraudulent misrepresentations were made in or around 1983, they were not discovered until 1990, less than a year prior to the commencement of the action in 1991. Since defendants come forward with no facts to cast doubt on the truth of the alleged 1990 discovery date, the proposed defense plainly lacks merit and was properly rejected notwithstanding the liberal policy governing amendment of pleadings.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Board of Managers of Gramercy Park v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1993
190 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Board of Managers of Gramercy Park v. Zucker

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE GRAMERCY PARK HABITAT CONDOMINIUM, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
594 N.Y.S.2d 18

Citing Cases

Woodward v. Millbrook Ventures LLC

Leave to amend a pleading must be denied where the proposed amendment is plainly lacking in merit. (See Bd.…

Wash. Heights Mezz LLC v. 74 Pinehurst LLC

. Notwithstanding the absence of prejudice, leave to amend a pleading must be denied where the proposed…