From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Educ. v. Un. Fed. of Teachers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 2003
304 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05007

Argued April 4, 2003.

April 28, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the appeal, as limited by the brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gigante, J.), dated November 20, 2001, as granted the petition to vacate the award to the extent of remitting the matter to the arbitrator to determine whether the petitioner's determination that Dorothy Jenkins committed an act of corporal punishment was arbitrary or capricious, and denied the cross motion to confirm the award.

James R. Sandner, New York, N.Y. (Steven A. Friedman of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Edward F. X. Hart and Tahirih M. Sadrieh of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA L. TOWNES, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the arbitration award is confirmed.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to vacate the arbitrator's award to the extent of remitting the matter for a new determination as to whether the petitioner's determination that Dorothy Jenkins, a paraprofessional, committed an act of corporal punishment was arbitrary or capricious, and denying the appellant's cross motion to confirm the award. The award, which rested upon the arbitrator's interpretation of the labor agreement, did not violate a strong public policy, was not irrational, and did not clearly exceed a specifically enumerated limitation of the arbitrator's power (see Matter of Albany County Sheriff's Local 775 of Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO [County Of Albany], 63 N.Y.2d 654; Matter of Elmira Hgts. Cent. School Dist. [Elmira Hgts. Educ. Support Staff Assn.], 250 A.D.2d 983; see also Matter of Wicks Constr. [Green], 295 A.D.2d 527; Matter of Recore [Chateaugay Cent. School Dist.], 256 A.D.2d 801; Matter of Neiman v. Backer, 211 A.D.2d 721).

SANTUCCI, J.P., LUCIANO, TOWNES and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Board of Educ. v. Un. Fed. of Teachers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 2003
304 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Board of Educ. v. Un. Fed. of Teachers

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 28, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 868

Citing Cases

Ebercohn-Mauro v. Board of Education of the City School District

The Supreme Court properly found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the hearing officer's…

In re of City of Middletown

The Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to vacate the arbitrator's award and in denying the cross…