Opinion
May 18, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant-respondent unfinished condominium unit was damaged by water leaking from an allegedly defective roof. Based on provisions of the offering plan, condominium declaration, and by-laws, the plaintiff Board of Managers of Dickerson Pond Condominium I had an obligation to maintain and repair the common elements that were substantially completed. Because there are questions of fact as to whether the roof, defined in the offering plan as part of the common elements, was substantially completed, summary judgment dismissing the counterclaims was properly denied ( see, CPLR 3212; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Furthermore, questions of fact regarding the plaintiffs' defenses of laches and equitable estoppel preclude summary judgment ( see, Tavernier v. Toner, 159 A.D.2d 1011; Guggenheim Found. v. Lubell, 153 A.D.2d 143, affd 77 N.Y.2d 311; Renda v. Frazer, 75 A.D.2d 490).
Contrary to the appellant-respondent's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to stay the entry and enforcement of a judgment of foreclosure pending the outcome of the trial on the counterclaims ( see, CPLR 2201; Matter of Abbady, 216 A.D.2d 115; cf., Residential Bd. of Mgrs. v. Berman, 213 A.D.2d 206).
The appellant-respondent's remaining contentions are without merit.
Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.