Opinion
(3277)
Argued January 9, 1985
Decision released March 19, 1985
Summary process action, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain, Housing Session at Hartford, and tried to the court, A. Aronson, J.; judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.
Ramon A. Pacheco, for the appellant (defendant).
Thomas C. Clark, with whom, on the brief, was Ann W. Goodwin, for the appellee (plaintiff).
This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the trial court granting immediate possession to the plaintiff in a summary process action. A memorandum of decision was not filed in this case, and the defendant did not seek an articulation of the basis of the trial court's decision. Practice Book 3082.
The defendant bore the burden of securing an adequate appellate record. Barnes v. Barnes, 190 Conn. 491, 493, 460 A.2d 1302 (1983). It could have accomplished this by obtaining an articulation under Practice Book 3082, but it did not. In re Juvenile Appeal (85-1), 3 Conn. App. 158, 161, 485 A.2d 1355 (1985). Under these circumstances, we decline to remand this case sua sponte for articulation. Urban v. Leggio, 1 Conn. App. 226, 228, 470 A.2d 1226 (1984). Since the record before us is completely inadequate, we have no basis upon which to find error.