From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blume v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1942
265 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

December 30, 1942.


Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, an infant, seven and one-half years of age, when using a slide, while engaged in playing the game of tag. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. No evidence of any violation of duty on the part of the appellant that had any causal relation to the accident was shown. To cast appellant in damages under the facts of this case would be imposing upon the city a responsibility greater than reasonable caution requires. ( Thompson v. Board of Education, 280 N.Y. 92; Curcio v. City of New York, 275 N.Y. 20; Peterson v. City of New York, 267 N.Y. 204; Miller v. Board of Education, Union Free School Dist. No. 1, Town of Oyster Bay, 249 App. Div. 738.)


There was an issue for the jury as to appellant's negligence by reason of the fact that the person in charge of the playground permitted the slide to be subjected to a use for which it was never intended.


Summaries of

Blume v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1942
265 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Blume v. City of Newburgh

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BLUME, by His Guardian ad Litem, WILLIAM F. BLUME, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Scala v. City of New York

(See Murray v. City of New York, 276 App. Div. 765, and De Salvo v. Stanley-Mark-Strand Corp., 281 N.Y. 333.)…

Pope v. State of New York

There is failure of proof of any violation of duty that had any causal relation to the unfortunate accident.…