From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blum Bldg. Co. v. Ingersoll

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 16, 1927
137 A. 916 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Decided May 16th, 1927.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J. Eq. 563.

Mr. Milton M. Unger, for the appellant.

Messrs. Howe Davis, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Blum Bldg. Co. v. Ingersoll

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 16, 1927
137 A. 916 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Blum Bldg. Co. v. Ingersoll

Case Details

Full title:BLUM BUILDING COMPANY, appellant, v. CHARLES H. INGERSOLL et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 16, 1927

Citations

137 A. 916 (N.J. 1927)
137 A. 916

Citing Cases

Silverstein v. Abco Vending Service, Inc.

We pass consideration of the contention that the actions for damages connote an election to terminate the…

Ray v. Beneficial Fin. Co.

Obviously, a contract cannot be entirely valid at the same time in which it is entirely void ab initio.…