From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blue v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2020
No. CV 19-2888-AB (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2020)

Opinion

No. CV 19-2888-AB (AGR)

09-15-2020

ANTHONY M. BLUE, Petitioner, v. WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

The court notes that the California Court of Appeal issued a decision on April 6, 2020 that affirmed the trial court's order declining to strike the 10-year firearm enhancement under Cal. Penal Code § 12022.53(b) and remanded the matter to the trial court to exercise its discretion as to whether to strike the 5-year enhancement under Cal. Penal Code § 667(a)(1). People v. Blue, 2020 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2186 (April 6, 2020). According to the online docket, a hearing in the Los Angeles County Superior Court is scheduled for September 11, 2020 in Case No. MA066161.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: September 15, 2020

/s/_________

ANDRE BIROTTE JR

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Blue v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2020
No. CV 19-2888-AB (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Blue v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY M. BLUE, Petitioner, v. WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 15, 2020

Citations

No. CV 19-2888-AB (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2020)