From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloodworth v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 13, 1996
672 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2488.

April 1, 1996. Rehearing Denied May 13, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County; Robert P. Cates, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, and Frederick Bloodworth, pro se, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


We affirm the revocation of appellant's probation and the sentence imposed thereon, but direct the trial court, on remand, to enter a written revocation order setting forth the conditions of probation which appellant was found to have violated. See McQuitter v. State, 622 So.2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (when trial court orally pronounces conditions of which probationer has been found in violation, but fails to place them in written form, remand is necessary for entry of order conforming to oral pronouncement).

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bloodworth v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 13, 1996
672 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Bloodworth v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BLOODWORTH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 13, 1996

Citations

672 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Monroe v. State

Although we affirm the revocation based upon the presence of these valid grounds, we must remand the case for…

Claiborne v. State

We affirm the revocation of appellant's community control, but direct the trial court, on remand, to enter a…