From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Block v. St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 1, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berkowitz, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

CPLR 7511 (b) provides, inter alia, that a party who participated in an arbitration may obtain a vacatur of the arbitration award if the rights of that party were prejudiced by the failure to follow the procedures prescribed in CPLR article 75. This avenue of relief is, however, forfeited where the party applying to vacate the award continued with the arbitration with notice of the defect and without interposing an objection thereto (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iv]).

With reference to the facts of this case, inasmuch as the appellant insurance company proceeded with the arbitration, without objection, its belated claim that the award should now be vacated on the ground that it never received a demand for arbitration, is without merit.

Equally unavailing is the insurer's challenge to the admissibility of an unsworn medical report which had been prepared by a physician who had examined the insured nearly three years subsequent to the accident. We find, as did the Supreme Court, that the admission of this report into evidence does not constitute sufficient grounds for vacating the award (see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 N.Y.2d 623; Matter of Pierre [General Acc. Ins.], 100 A.D.2d 705, lv denied 63 N.Y.2d 601; Dahn v Luchs, 92 A.D.2d 537).

Finally, the appellant's contention that the award is excessive was not raised before the Supreme Court and, therefore, not properly preserved for appellate review (see, Matter of Kenner v Coughlin, 105 A.D.2d 1130, lv dismissed 65 N.Y.2d 603, 760). In any event, "[i]t is well established that an arbitrator is not required to justify his award; it must merely be evident that there exists a rational basis for it upon a reading of the record" (see, Dahn v Luchs, supra, at 538). On the basis of the present record, we conclude that the award rendered by the arbitrator was supported by the proof submitted and was, therefore, rational. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Block v. St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Block v. St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH BLOCK, Respondent, v. ST. PAUL FIRE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

TRAVELERS PROP. CAS. CO. OF AMERICA v. SWEN

An arbitrator is not required to justify his award, it must merely be evident that there exists a rational…

Schwimmer v. Malinas

An arbitration award will be vacated if the court finds that the rights of that party were prejudiced by a…