From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloch v. Hood

U.S.
Oct 6, 2003
540 U.S. 892 (2003)

Summary

In Hood v. Bloch, 29 W. Va. 244, 11 S.E. 910, 913, the court said: "`Where a manufacturer undertakes to supply goods manufactured by himself, or in which he deals, but which the vendee has not had the opportunity of inspecting, it is an implied term in the contract that he shall supply a merchantable article.' Gardiner v. Gray, 4 Camp. 144; Laing v. Fidgeon, 4 Camp. 169; Shepherd v. Pybus, 3 Man. G. 868."

Summary of this case from Frigorifico Wilson De La Argentina v. Weirton Steel Co.

Opinion

No. 03-5176.

October 6, 2003.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 65 Fed. Appx. 510.


Summaries of

Bloch v. Hood

U.S.
Oct 6, 2003
540 U.S. 892 (2003)

In Hood v. Bloch, 29 W. Va. 244, 11 S.E. 910, 913, the court said: "`Where a manufacturer undertakes to supply goods manufactured by himself, or in which he deals, but which the vendee has not had the opportunity of inspecting, it is an implied term in the contract that he shall supply a merchantable article.' Gardiner v. Gray, 4 Camp. 144; Laing v. Fidgeon, 4 Camp. 169; Shepherd v. Pybus, 3 Man. G. 868."

Summary of this case from Frigorifico Wilson De La Argentina v. Weirton Steel Co.
Case details for

Bloch v. Hood

Case Details

Full title:BLOCH v. HOOD, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS REGIONAL…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 6, 2003

Citations

540 U.S. 892 (2003)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Shackleford

-- If an order is given for an undescribed, unascertained thing, stated to be for a particular purpose, the…

Pleasants v. Pendleton

The question whether a sale of personal property is complete or only executory, is to be determined from the…