From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bliss v. Sickles

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 24, 1894
142 N.Y. 647 (N.Y. 1894)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Bliss v. Sickles (50 N.Y. St. Repr. 139) there were intervals of five and eight months between the false representations and the transactions founded on them; and in The Naugatuck Cutlery Co. v. Babcock (22 Hun; 481) there was an interval of five months.

Summary of this case from Bradley v. Seaboard National Bank
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

Argued April 11, 1894

Decided April 24, 1894

Alexander Blumenstiel for appellants.

Frederic R. Kellogg for respondents.

ANDREWS, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Summaries of

Bliss v. Sickles

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 24, 1894
142 N.Y. 647 (N.Y. 1894)

In Bliss v. Sickles (50 N.Y. St. Repr. 139) there were intervals of five and eight months between the false representations and the transactions founded on them; and in The Naugatuck Cutlery Co. v. Babcock (22 Hun; 481) there was an interval of five months.

Summary of this case from Bradley v. Seaboard National Bank

In Bliss v. Sickles et al. (supra) the defendants made statements to a mercantile agency in December, 1888, and in May and August, 1889, which the plaintiff relied on in making sales between January 11 and April 26, 1890, and it was held that these statements were continuing ones on which the plaintiff had the right to rely, and if fraudulent, that the sales could be rescinded and the goods recovered.

Summary of this case from Humphrey v. Smith
Case details for

Bliss v. Sickles

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS N. BLISS et al., Respondents, v . DANIEL E. SICKLES et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 24, 1894

Citations

142 N.Y. 647 (N.Y. 1894)
59 N.Y. St. Rptr. 168
36 N.E. 1064

Citing Cases

Tindle v. Birkett

The same principle was decided in a more recent case. ( Bliss v. Sickles, 142 N.Y. 647. ) The objections…

Humphrey v. Smith

This ruling was error, for which a new trial must be granted. It is well settled in this State that if a…

7 Citing Cases