Opinion
14-062/063
08-05-2014
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Hunter, Jr., JJ.
Plaintiff, as limited by its briefs, appeals and defendant cross-appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Frank P. Nervo, J.), entered August 2, 2013, as denied their respective cross motions for summary judgment.
Per Curiam.
Order (Frank P. Nervo, J.), entered August 2, 2013, modified to grant defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
While an exchange of emails may constitute a binding contract (see e.g. Stevens v Publicis S.A., 50 AD3d 253, 255-256 [2008]), the email exchange here at issue — by which defendant-tenant purported to agree to "split the cost" of certain bedbug extermination and related expenses incurred by plaintiff-landlord — created no enforceable contractual rights. The parties' cost-sharing arrangement served to dilute the landlord's statutory obligation to remedy a rent-impairing condition of which it had notice, and thus was "void as an attempt to circumvent [the] warrant[y] of habitability" (Fraley Realty Corp. v Stocker, 115 Misc 2d 52, 53 [App Term, 1st Dept 1982]; see Real Property Law § 235-b[2]).
The parties' remaining contentions, to the extent preserved for appellate review, lack merit.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: August 05, 2014