From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blankenship v. Holding

U.S.
May 15, 1967
387 U.S. 95 (1967)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.

No. 1089.

Decided May 15, 1967.

259 F. Supp. 694, affirmed.

Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellee.


Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.


Summaries of

Blankenship v. Holding

U.S.
May 15, 1967
387 U.S. 95 (1967)
Case details for

Blankenship v. Holding

Case Details

Full title:BLANKENSHIP ET AL. v . HOLDING, DBA GRAND NEWS

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 15, 1967

Citations

387 U.S. 95 (1967)

Citing Cases

Cherokee News Arcade, Inc. v. State

1966). Affirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Blankenship v. Holding, 387 U.S. 95, 87 S.Ct. 1419, 18…