From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blankenship v. Aweigh

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Sep 17, 2007
Case No. 6:07-cv-82-Orl-28KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 17, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 6:07-cv-82-Orl-28KRS.

September 17, 2007


ORDER


This case is before the Court on the Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Vessel, M/V Cary'd Aweigh, In Rem (Doc. No. 20) filed May 10, 2007. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that Plaintiffs, the only party appearing in this action, have filed a Consent to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23), the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Report and Recommendation filed September 14, 2007 (Doc. No. 22) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. A default having been entered as to the M/V Cary'd Aweigh on April 16, 2007 (Doc. 19), the Clerk of Court is directed to enter a default judgment against the M/V Cary'd Aweigh directing that possession of the M/V Cary'd Aweigh is transferred to Hugh Edward Blankenship and Sandra L. Blankenship.

3. Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, within eleven (11) days from the date of this Order, why the remaining claims against Mark Laneve should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Blankenship v. Aweigh

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Sep 17, 2007
Case No. 6:07-cv-82-Orl-28KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Blankenship v. Aweigh

Case Details

Full title:HUGH EDWARD BLANKENSHIP and SANDRA L. BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiffs, v. M/V…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Sep 17, 2007

Citations

Case No. 6:07-cv-82-Orl-28KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 17, 2007)

Citing Cases

Pierre v. Venus Satellite, Inc.

Because the Court is to review only the allegations of Plaintiff's Complaint, and Plaintiff has not cited any…