From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. Blake

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2017
156 A.D.3d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

5224 Index 300484/15

12-14-2017

Maria BLAKE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Gregory BLAKE, Defendant–Respondent.

Felder, Felder and Nottes, PC, New York (Daniel H. Stock of counsel), for appellant. Elliott Scheinberg, New City, for respondent.


Felder, Felder and Nottes, PC, New York (Daniel H. Stock of counsel), for appellant.

Elliott Scheinberg, New City, for respondent.

Gische, J.P., Webber, Oing, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. Nervo, J.), entered April 20, 2017, which, in this divorce action, sua sponte dismissed the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the complaint reinstated.

A sua sponte order is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701[a][2] ; Sholes v. Meagher, 100 N.Y.2d 333, 335, 763 N.Y.S.2d 522, 794 N.E.2d 664 [2003] ). However, given the extraordinary nature of the sua sponte relief, that is, dismissal of the complaint, the parties' competing claims, and the court's failure to identify a legal basis for dismissing the complaint other than that an action between the parties was pending in New Jersey seeking the same relief—a ground it had previously rejected in retaining jurisdiction over the financial issues ancillary to the divorce action—we deem the notice of appeal from the order to be a motion for leave to appeal, and grant such leave (see CPLR 5701[c] ; see e.g. All Craft Fabricators, Inc. v. ATC Assoc., Inc., 153 A.D.3d 1159, 60 N.Y.S.3d 660 [1st Dept. 2017]; Serradilla v. Lords Corp., 12 A.D.3d 279, 280, 785 N.Y.S.2d 433 [1st Dept. 2004] ). A court's power to dismiss a complaint, sua sponte, "should be used sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances" ( Ray v. Lee Chen, 148 A.D.3d 568, 569, 50 N.Y.S.3d 62 [1st Dept. 2017] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Here, based on the record before us, no such circumstances exist to warrant dismissal. Further, in the absence of notice to plaintiff wife that the complaint would be dismissed, "the court was virtually without jurisdiction to grant the relief afforded" to defendant husband ( id. [internal quotation marks omitted] ).


Summaries of

Blake v. Blake

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2017
156 A.D.3d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Blake v. Blake

Case Details

Full title:Maria BLAKE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Gregory BLAKE, Defendant–Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 14, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
65 N.Y.S.3d 454
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 8738

Citing Cases

Tezoco v. GE & LO Corp.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered on or about December 7, 2020, which, to the…

Tezoco v. Ge & Lo Corp.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered on or about December 7, 2020, which, to the…