Opinion
No. 30342
February 25, 2010.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
By: MOON, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, DUFFY, and RECKTENWALD, JJ.
ORDER
Upon consideration of petitioner Richard Blaisdell's "petition for a writ of mandamus," which we treat as a petition for a declaratory judgment, it appears that issuance of a declaratory judgment on the constitutionality and enforceability of Act 75, 26th Leg., Reg. Sess. (2009) is not within the original jurisdiction of the supreme court. See HRS §§ 602-5 (Supp. 2009) and 632-1 (1993). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a declaratory judgment is dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 25, 2010.