From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blair v. Kawasaki Rail Car, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 8, 2019
2018-2098 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)

Opinion

2018-2098

08-08-2019

SCOTT BLAIR, Appellant v. KAWASAKI RAIL CAR, INC., Appellee

DARIUSH KEYHANI, Keyhani LLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. SHEILA MORTAZAVI, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ZAED M. BILLAH, MARK ALEXANDER CHAPMAN, ARMIN GHIAM.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-00117.

JUDGMENT

DARIUSH KEYHANI, Keyhani LLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. SHEILA MORTAZAVI, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ZAED M. BILLAH, MARK ALEXANDER CHAPMAN, ARMIN GHIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 8, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Blair v. Kawasaki Rail Car, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 8, 2019
2018-2098 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Blair v. Kawasaki Rail Car, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT BLAIR, Appellant v. KAWASAKI RAIL CAR, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 8, 2019

Citations

2018-2098 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)

Citing Cases

Blair v. Alstom Transp., Inc.

On August 8, 2019, the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed the PTAB's decision in the first IPR. See Blair v.…