From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. Blackwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 18, 1991
589 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-03452.

November 8, 1991. Rehearing Denied December 18, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; William A. Norris, Jr., Judge.

Stevan T. Northcutt, Levine, Hirsch, Segall Northcutt, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Theodore L. Tripp, Jr., Garvin Tripp, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellee.


We do not conclude there was an abuse of discretion in the trial court's denial of the former wife's petition for increased alimony. See Bedell v. Bedell, 583 So.2d 1005, 1007 (Fla. 1991) (in a proceeding to increase alimony, "[A] substantial increase in the financial ability of the paying spouse, standing alone, may justify but does not require an order of increased alimony. Subject to the abuse of discretion principle set forth in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980), the final decision rests with the circuit court."); Compare Schlesinger v. Emmons, 566 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

We also do not conclude there was an abuse of discretion in the amount of the trial court's award of attorney's fees and costs to the former wife.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blackwell v. Blackwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 18, 1991
589 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Blackwell v. Blackwell

Case Details

Full title:DORIS Z. BLACKWELL, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM L. BLACKWELL, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 18, 1991

Citations

589 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Ragar v. Ragar

When there is a substantial disparity in the parties' annual income and no substantial, ready…