From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blacksher v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. 08-20132 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 08-20132 Case No. 11-11826

11-18-2011

DANNY LAMONT BLACKSHER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


Honorable Thomas L. Ludington


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,

DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT

SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255, AND GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

MOTION TO PETITIONER'S DISMISS MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (ECF No. 70) issued by Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder on October 13, 2011, on Petitioner's motion to vacate the sentence (ECF No. 56) and Respondent's motion to dismiss the motion to vacate the sentence (ECF No. 69). Judge Binder recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's motion, grant Respondent's motion, and dismiss the petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In his § 2255 petition, Petitioner raises three issues: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's failure to perfect an appeal after having been instructed to do so; (2) abuse of discretion by the district court for failure to consider Petitioner's pro se motion for downward departure; and (3) application of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 to result in a reduction in Petitioner's sentence.

As of today's date, no party has filed any objections to Judge Binder's report and recommendation. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Binder's report and recommendation (ECF No. 70) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to vacate the sentence (ECF No. 56) is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss the motion to vacate the sentence (ECF No. 69) is GRANTED.

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE


The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and upon

Danny Lamont Blacksher, #42317039 at Herlong Federal Correctional

Institution, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. Box 800, Herlong, CA 96113 by

first class U.S. mail on November 18, 2011.

TRACY A. JACOBS


Summaries of

Blacksher v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. 08-20132 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Blacksher v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DANNY LAMONT BLACKSHER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 08-20132 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 18, 2011)

Citing Cases

Simmons v. United States

Nunez was summarily reversed -- but only on grounds that it had read the defendant's waiver of his appellate…

Gourdine v. United States

Nunez was summarily reversed - but only on grounds that it had read the defendant's waiver of his appellate…