From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bitzko v. Gamache

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 1990
168 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 27, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).


Defense counsel's appearance at the arbitration hearing without his clients and his refusal to participate in the hearing constituted a default on the part of defendants (see, Finamore v. Huntington Cardiac Rehabilitation Assn., 150 A.D.2d 426). Although 22 NYCRR 28.7 (a) provides for vacating an arbitration award where a party defaults upon a showing of "good cause", the record herein fails to indicate any valid reason for the failure to proceed with arbitration. Accordingly, defendants failed to demonstrate "good cause" and the motion to vacate the default judgment was properly denied (see, Sassower v. Higbee, 96 A.D.2d 588).

Order affirmed, without costs. Weiss, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bitzko v. Gamache

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 1990
168 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Bitzko v. Gamache

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL K. BITZKO, Doing Business as MIKE BITZKO ROOFING SIDING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
564 N.Y.S.2d 808

Citing Cases

Tripp v. Reitman Blacktop

A party's failure to appear at an arbitration hearing clearly constitutes a default pursuant to 22 NYCRR 28.7…

Tripp v. B. Reitman Blacktop, Inc.

A party's failure to appear at an arbitration, hearing clearly constitutes a default pursuant to 22 NYCRR…