From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 22, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00385-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00385-WYD-MEH.

February 22, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel (dock. #38), which was granted in part and denied in part (dock. #50). In doing so, the Court directed Defendant State Farm to submit certain documents subject to the work product doctrine for in camera review. Defendant's Notice of Submission (dock. #51) sets forth the documents that were withheld on this basis and as corrected at the Status Conference held February 20, 2008. The Court has reviewed the documents therein and has determined that the majority of the documents were properly withheld and that Plaintiff has not established a substantial need for these documents.

As to the Injury Evaluation Report ("IER"), the Court finds, consistent with the case law cited in its previous Order (dock. #50 at 3-4), that Plaintiff has established a substantial need for the report. Whether the IER can sufficiently support a claim for bad faith is a decision for the District Judge to consider and, potentially, the trier of fact. Accordingly, Defendant State Farm shall produce to Plaintiff the documents Bates numbered BUIM 01000-6, the IER, on or before February 25, 2008.

Defendant may retrieve the documents submitted for in camera review on or before February 29, 2008.


Summaries of

Bishelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 22, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00385-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Bishelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE BISHELLI, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 22, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00385-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Cunningham v. Standard Fire Insurance Company

The Court finds that information from the performance evaluations which relates to claims handling conduct is…

BACH v. HYATT CORPORATION

In several recent decisions, the federal courts have declined to follow the Alcon model for production of…