From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bisbee v. Mallicott

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 2, 1982
293 Or. 797 (Or. 1982)

Opinion

TC A7812-19980, CA A21061, SC 28948

On suggestion of lack of jurisdiction September 23, 1982.

Dismissed and remanded November 2, 1982.

On Suggestion of Lack of Jurisdiction filed in this court September 23, 1982 by Mildred J. Carmack of Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore Roberts, Portland, who previously represented Respondent Frank W. King, now deceased.

No appearance contra.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Court of Appeals decision as to defendant, Frank W. King, reversed and case remanded to Court of Appeals to dismiss appeal as against that defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Bisbee brought several suits which were consolidated for trial in November, 1980. In this opinion we are concerned only with his action for damages for legal malpractice against Frank W. King. The trial court issued a written decision denying relief on February 12, 1981. Frank W. King died on April 13, 1981. The "Trial Judgement and Decree" was entered on April 21, 1981. A personal representative was appointed for his estate May 12, 1981. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on May 21, 1981, and served notice only on King's former counsel, without serving notice on defendant's personal representative or her counsel. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. 58 Or. App. 749, 650 P.2d 1098 (1982). Plaintiff now petitions this court for review.

The attorneys who represented King in the trial court filed a "suggestion of lack of jurisdiction" in both the Court of Appeals and this court, bringing to our attention that plaintiff did not ask for a substitution of parties within one year of defendant's death, as required under ORCP 34B.(2). ORCP 34B.(2) states:

"B. Death of a party; continued proceedings. In case of the death of a party, the court shall, on motion, allow the action to be continued:

"* * * *

"B.(2) Against such party's personal representative or successors in interest at any time within four months after the date of the first publication of notice to interested persons, but not more than one year after such party's death."

When a party dies before the entry of a final order and before an appeal is taken, the decedent's personal representative should be substituted as a party, and a notice of appeal must be served on the personal representative. The appellate court has no jurisdiction of the estate or its personal representative until the substitution is made and notice given to the personal representative. Oregon Auto-Dispatch v. Caldwell, 67 Or. 301, 303, 135 P. 880 (1913). See also Adams v. Perry, 168 Or. 132, 136, 111 P.2d 838, 119 P.2d 581 (1941).

Because plaintiff failed to substitute the personal representative as a party following the death of the defendant, neither the Court of Appeals or this court has jurisdiction. Therefore we dismiss the appeal as against defendant, Frank W. King and remand to the Court of Appeals to vacate their opinion as to the same defendant.


Summaries of

Bisbee v. Mallicott

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 2, 1982
293 Or. 797 (Or. 1982)
Case details for

Bisbee v. Mallicott

Case Details

Full title:BISBEE, Petitioner on Review, v. MALLICOTT, Respondent on Review

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Nov 2, 1982

Citations

293 Or. 797 (Or. 1982)
653 P.2d 239

Citing Cases

In re J. M. S.

Generally, when a party dies before the entry of a final order and before an appeal is taken, the appellate…

Castro v. Ogburn

At the outset, defendant contends that this court lacks jurisdiction of this appeal, because the named…