From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bill Seidle Aircraft v. Bellomy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 14, 2001
782 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D99-2988.

Opinion filed March 14, 2001. Rehearing Denied May 2, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, David L. Tobin, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 97-18063.

Affirmed.

Richard K. Stanton and Irving B. Levenson, for appellant.

Anania, Bandklayder, Blackwell, Baumgarten Torricella, and Maurice J. Baumgarten, and Douglas H. Stein, for appellees.

Before GREEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, JJ.


Appellant, Bill Seidle Aircraft Sales Services, Inc., plaintiff below, appeals an adverse summary judgment in its rescission action against the appellees. We affirm where the record affirmatively discloses that the appellant has abandoned its argument made in opposition to the motion before the trial court and now raises a new argument for the first time on appeal. See Dade County School Board v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638, 644 (Fla. 1999); Wildwood Properties, Inc. v. Archer of Vero Beach, Inc., 621 So.2d 691, 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (an argument not presented to the trial court in opposition to a motion for summary judgment may not be raised in an appeal of that summary judgment.).


Summaries of

Bill Seidle Aircraft v. Bellomy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 14, 2001
782 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Bill Seidle Aircraft v. Bellomy

Case Details

Full title:BILL SEIDLE AIRCRAFT SALES SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. HERROL W. BELLOMY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 14, 2001

Citations

782 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Bal Harbour Village v. Welsh

Welsh therefore reasons that because there was no limitation on the number of pets a Village resident could…