From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bilal v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-9

In the Matter of Shateek Amin BILAL, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Shateek Amin Bilal, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.


Shateek Amin Bilal, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MERCURE, Acting P.J., ROSE, SPAIN, MALONE JR. and McCARTHY, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

While a correction officer was making rounds, petitioner, an inmate, threw broken plastic pieces of a state-issued razor out of his cell and informed the officer that he was going to cut himself with the blade. After other officers arrived, petitioner surrendered half of the razor blade and was then escorted off the gallery. For his involvement in the incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a weapon and an altered item, interference and refusing a direct order. A subsequent search of petitioner's cell revealed a single pill in the front pocket of a pair of his pants and an unmarked bottle of pills in his locker. As a result, he received a second misbehavior report charging him with possession of unauthorized medication and smuggling. A tier III disciplinary hearing was conducted, after which petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, after which petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Initially, the Attorney General concedes, and we agree, that petitioner's mental health status was at issue with regard to the incident involving the razor and, therefore, the Hearing Officer erred in denying certain testimony regarding his mental condition ( see 7 NYCRR 254.6; Matter of Abreu v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1241, 1241, 930 N.Y.S.2d 301 [2011] ). Accordingly, that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of possession of a weapon and an altered item, interference and refusing a direct order must be annulled and references thereto expunged from his institutional record ( see Matter of Abreu v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d at 1242, 930 N.Y.S.2d 301; Matter of Platten v. Bezio, 73 A.D.3d 1419, 1419–1420, 902 N.Y.S.2d 211 [2010] ). We note that, because petitioner has already served the penalty and no loss of good time was imposed, the matter need not be remitted for a redetermination of the penalty ( see Matter of George v. Bezio, 85 A.D.3d 1469, 1470, 927 N.Y.S.2d 168 [2011]; Matter of Sierra v. Fischer, 82 A.D.3d 1436, 1437, 918 N.Y.S.2d 682 [2011] ).

Turning to the remaining charges, we find that the misbehavior report, testimony from the correction officer who performed the search and authored the report, petitioner's admission that he possessed the drug Neurontin and testimony of a facility nurse that he was not authorized to do so provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Cole v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 87 A.D.3d 1243, 1243, 931 N.Y.S.2d 712 [2011]; Matter of Arrington v. Venettozzi, 87 A.D.3d 1215, 1215, 929 N.Y.S.2d 784 [2011] ). Any discrepancies between the misbehavior report and the contraband receipt, as well as petitioner's claim that the charges were in retaliation for a federal lawsuit he filed, presented credibility issues to be resolved by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of White v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1249, 1250, 930 N.Y.S.2d 306 [2011]; Matter of Polite v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1212, 1212, 929 N.Y.S.2d 782 [2011] ).

The remainder of petitioner's contentions have been either rendered academic or considered and determined to be unpreserved or without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of possession of a weapon and an altered item, interference and refusing a direct order and imposed a penalty; petition granted to that extent and respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.


Summaries of

Bilal v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Bilal v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Shateek Amin BILAL, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

92 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
938 N.Y.S.2d 363
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 872

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fischer

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III disciplinary…

Whitted v. State Dep't of Corr. Servs.

Initially, we note that petitioner acknowledges that his plea of guilty to the three charges in the first…