Opinion
No. 68807
09-14-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges several of the district court's pretrial rulings. Having reviewed the petition and its accompanying motion for a stay, we decline to intervene. Petitioner has a remedy at law by way of an appeal from any adverse final judgment. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 88 P.3d 840 (2004); NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330, and we are not convinced that that remedy is inadequate under the circumstances presented, see Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. ___, 262 P.3d 360 (2010) (describing narrow exceptions when writ relief may be warranted despite availability of an alternative remedy at law). Accordingly, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issues raised in the petition, we deny the motion for stay and
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge
Ford, Walker, Haggerty & Behar
Injury Lawyers of Nevada
Eighth District Court Clerk