From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bieler v. Bieler

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Jul 12, 1954
130 Colo. 17 (Colo. 1954)

Summary

recognizing that temporary maintenance is intended to allow a spouse to live in his or her "accustomed manner" pending the dissolution proceeding

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Herold

Opinion

No. 17,429.

Decided July 12, 1954.

An action for divorce. The trial court ordered defendant to pay certain amounts to the wife as temporary alimony and attorney fees.

Affirmed.

1. DIVORCE AND ALIMONY — Temporary Alimony "Right to temporary alimony arises out of the legal obligation of the husband to support the wife".

2. Temporary Alimony — Pleadings. In an action for divorce it is held that; The pleadings to be considered on application for temporary alimony include the application papers as well as the complaint in the action and, under our notice form of pleadings, it is not necessary to set out the facts upon which the application is based.

3. Temporary Alimony. The purpose of temporary alimony and attorney fees is to place the wife on an equal footing with the husband in the maintenance of the proceeding.

4. Temporary Alimony. Right to temporary alimony is not dependent on the merits of the case.

5. Temporary Alimony. Ordinarily a wife is entitled to temporary alimony, although she is possessed of independent means sufficient for her support and the maintenance of the suit, where her estate is small and she would be required to impair the capital of the estate in so doing.

6. Temporary Alimony — Court Discretion — Appeal and Error. "The amount of the award [temporary alimony] is a matter of the trial court's discretion, and will not be disturbed except on clear showing of abuse of discretion.

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Joseph E. Cook, Judge.

Mr. F. W. HARDING, Mr. G. E. BOATRIGHT, for plaintiff in error.

MR. BENJAMIN E. SWEET, for defendant in error.


THIS is an action for divorce brought by the wife on the ground of cruelty. While there was included a prayer for temporary alimony and attorney fees, the complaint alleged that plaintiff was then gainfully employed. However, some four months, later, plaintiff filed her affidavit setting forth her assets, income and liabilities, and alleging that she was then unemployed and unable for some time to be engaged in any gainful employment, because of her physical condition and advice of physicians. Thereafter, upon hearing plaintiff's application, the court awarded her $55 per week, together with $200 for temporary attorney fees. Such award is here challenged, upon the grounds: (1)That pleadings do not entitle plaintiff to such relief; and (2) that the record shows that she is not destitute of the means of subsistence to entitle her to such relief.

[1, 2] As to the first grounds: Right to temporary alimony arises out of the legal obligation of the husband to support the wife. Such obligation may exist at the time of the filing of the complaint or it may arise after wards. It is an ancillary matter when sought to be enforced in a divorce proceeding and the right of enforcement does not depend necessarily upon the situation of the parties at the time of the filing of the suit, but upon the condition at the time it is sought. Therefore, the pleadings to be considered include application papers as well as the complaint in the action and, under our notice form of pleadings, it is not necessary to set out the facts upon which the application is based.

As to the second ground: The evidence before the court showed that plaintiff had remained living in the little family home in which she owned a one-half interest; that in addition to such interest and furniture, household goods, clothing, jewelry and Ford car, she owned $2500.00 in government bonds and approximately $1000.00 in savings account and bank account, and that her mother, who lived with her, paid her from $55.00 to $75.00 per month. Against this she showed debts in excess of $600.00, all apparently for care of herself and property.

The record showed that the husband had assets other than furniture and tools totalling more than $75,000.00 largely consisting of rental properties and liabilities of under $9,000.00, largely consisting of mortgage debts; that he was a practising architect and that his net income before income taxes in 1953 was about $9,400.00 and the gross rental from his properties exceeded $600.00 monthly. There are no children.

[3, 6] It is the purpose of temporary alimony and attorney fees to place the wife on an equal footing with her husband for her support and her maintenance of the proceeding. Daniels v. Daniels, 9 Colo. 133, 10 Pac. 657. It does not depend on the merits of the case., Ordinarily, she is not required to sacrifice her assets, particularly if small, in order to support herself and maintain her suit. "The manifest purposes of pendente lite allowance to a wife are to enable her to live in her accustomed manner pending the disposition of the action and to provide her with whatever is needed by her to litigate properly her side of the controversy * * *. If she possesses independent means sufficient for these purposes the allowances should not be granted. * * * However, she is not required first to impair the capital of her separate estate". Loeb v. Loeb, 84 Cal. App. 2d 141, 190 P.2d 246. The amount of the award is a matter of the trial court's discretion, and will not be disturbed except on clear showing of abuse of discretion. No abuse of discretion here appears.

The order of the trial court for payment of temporary alimony and attorney fees is affirmed; our order that payments made thereunder be retained by the clerk is revoked; and the clerk of the trial court is ordered to pay to plaintiff forth with all monies retained by him thereunder.


Summaries of

Bieler v. Bieler

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Jul 12, 1954
130 Colo. 17 (Colo. 1954)

recognizing that temporary maintenance is intended to allow a spouse to live in his or her "accustomed manner" pending the dissolution proceeding

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Herold
Case details for

Bieler v. Bieler

Case Details

Full title:BIELER v. BIELER

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc

Date published: Jul 12, 1954

Citations

130 Colo. 17 (Colo. 1954)
272 P.2d 636

Citing Cases

Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of Control, Wyo.

The law of Colorado fully supports the suggested inter-relationship between the principles of avoidance of…

In re Marriage of Herold

This allows the court to fulfill an important purpose of temporary maintenance — "to place the parties on an…