From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bielat v. Montrose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1998
249 A.D.2d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.).


In this needlessly protracted and contentious litigation, the determinations of the IAS Court regulating the conduct of discovery were well within its power to make and were appropriate exercises of discretion ( see, CPLR 3103, 3126 N.Y.C.P.L.R.; Lipin v. Bender, 84 N.Y.2d 562, 570-571; Soper v. Wilkinson Match, 176 A.D.2d 1025; Rossi v. Lin, 189 A.D.2d 868).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Bielat v. Montrose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1998
249 A.D.2d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Bielat v. Montrose

Case Details

Full title:JAY S. BIELAT, Respondent, v. BARRY MONTROSE et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 113

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. 40 W. 22nd St. Tenants Coop. Corp.

The collective inquiry by all defendants shall be limited to two hours, including answers, but excluding…

Luna v. Brodcom W. Dev. Co.

To avoid duplication of Ralph Cruz's testimony, the inquiry by plaintiff shall be limited to three hours,…