From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biddle v. Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 15, 1952
58 So. 2d 596 (Ala. 1952)

Opinion

8 Div. 622.

April 3, 1952. Rehearing Denied May 15, 1952.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marshall County, J. S. Stone, J.

Clark E. Johnson, Jr., Albertville, for appellant.

Jackson, Rives, Pettus Peterson, Birmingham, for appellee.

To review ruling of trial court inducing non-suit, there must be a final judgment in proper form disposing of case and allowing prevailing party to go hence. In absence of such judgment the appeal must be dismissed ex mero motu. Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 819; Wallace v. Screws, 225 Ala. 187, 142 So. 572; Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. Ward, 237 Ala. 474, 187 So. 462; Mitchell v. National Life A. Ins. Co., 30 Ala. App. 301, 5 So.2d 115; Grigsby v. White, 31 Ala. App. 90, 12 So.2d 570; Heffelfinger v. Lane, 239 Ala. 151, 194 So. 504.


Appellant seeks to review a judgment of the circuit court, at law, sustaining a demurrer to a petition seeking to obtain a declaratory judgment as to the liability of appellee by virtue of an insurance policy protecting the partnership, of which he is a member, from liability on account of the operation of a certain truck. There are many defects suggested by the demurrer. The petition contains inconsistent allegations as to dates.

The suit is by one partner on a partnership insurance contract. Hood v. Martin, 205 Ala. 332, 87 So. 529; Fred Gray Cotton Gin Co. v. Smith, 214 Ala. 606, 108 So. 532. The substance of the claim is that the insurer acted in bad faith in refusing to join appellant in the settlement of two suits against him for an amount much less than the judgments which were later rendered against him, exceeding the limit of liability provided for in the policy. Plaintiff is alleged to have paid the amount of such excess. There is some foundation for such a claim when properly presented. 45 C.J.S. Insurance, § 936, page 1069.

We need not consider whether the Act of October 9, 1947, General Acts 1947, page 444, section 167, Title 7, Code, justifies such a suit, in view of other remedies, since we cannot entertain the appeal because there was no final judgment from which the appeal was taken. The judgment recites that plaintiff elected to take a nonsuit because of the adverse rulings of the court, and it proceeds: "the same being considered by the court, it is therefore ordered and adjudged by the court that nonsuit be and the same is hereby granted." Such an entry does not contain the essentials of a final judgment necessary to support an appeal to obtain the review authorized by section 819, Title 7, Code. Wallace v. Screws, 225 Ala. 187, 142 So. 572; Davison v. Stutts, 233 Ala. 491, 172 So. 600; Heffelfinger v. Lane, 239 Ala. 151, 194 So. 504; Mitchell v. National Life Accident Ins. Co., 30 Ala. App. 301, 5 So.2d 115; Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co., 234 Ala. 313, 174 So. 530.

It is therefore necessary to dismiss the appeal, leaving the proceeding in fieri in the circuit court.

Appeal dismissed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Biddle v. Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 15, 1952
58 So. 2d 596 (Ala. 1952)
Case details for

Biddle v. Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama

Case Details

Full title:BIDDLE v. EMPLOYERS INS. CO. OF ALABAMA, Inc

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 15, 1952

Citations

58 So. 2d 596 (Ala. 1952)
58 So. 2d 596

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Biddle

The circuit court erred, in its ruling of June 13, 1952, in granting defendant's motion to correct the…

Townsend v. McCall

There is no feature of the judgment which is sufficient to support an appeal. If it were a final judgment…