From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BIAS v. BIAS

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 6, 1979
374 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

Nos. 79-657, 79-792.

July 24, 1979. Rehearing Denied September 6, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Joseph J. Gersten, J.

Elizabeth S. Baker and Kathy Hamilton, Legal Services of Greater Miami, Miami, for appellant.

Louis M. Rockman and Edward A. Dion, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.


These interlocutory appeals grow out of the same child custody case. Two questions are presented; first, there is a question concerning the jurisdiction of the Florida court and second, there is a question concerning whether the decision of the court was an abuse of its discretion in such matters. It appears to us that the Florida court had jurisdiction where the presence of the child in another state was solely effected by the mother, who maintained the child in that state in violation of a court-recognized stipulation. We find no abuse of discretion in the ruling on the merits. See Smith v. Davis, 147 So.2d 177, 179-180 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962).

Cf. Baird v. Baird, 374 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); filed this same date, where the appellee mother was not in violation of any court order when she initially brought her child into the State of Florida and where the Florida trial court's subsequent actions were discretionary under the provisions of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, Sections 61.1302-61.1348, Florida Statutes (1977).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

BIAS v. BIAS

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 6, 1979
374 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

BIAS v. BIAS

Case Details

Full title:SADIE BIAS, N/K/A SADIE PATE, APPELLANT, v. WARNER BIAS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 6, 1979

Citations

374 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Pace v. Pace

The court in Zuccaro stated that since the order below vindicated this "salutary statutory purpose", that…

Mondy v. Mondy

Although the father had originally taken the children unilaterally, we find this to be no justification for…