From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bialock v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 2002
299 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 02-00959

November 15, 2002.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Kirk, J.), entered January 14, 2002, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

AINSWORTH, SULLIVAN, TRACY, KNAUF, WARNER AND RUSLANDER, P.C., ALBANY (VINCENT J. DE LEONARDIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BLUMBERG CARRIG, LITTLE FALLS (BART M. CARRIG OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Kirk, J.


Summaries of

Bialock v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 2002
299 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Bialock v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET BIALOCK AND MATTHEW BIALOCK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SEARS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 550