From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bey v. Hollenbeck

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 5, 2015
616 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6468

10-05-2015

SHARU BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN HOLLENBECK, Respondent - Appellee.

Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02016-FL) Before MOTZ, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Hollenbeck, No. 5:14-hc-02016-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2015). We deny Bey's motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bey v. Hollenbeck

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 5, 2015
616 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Bey v. Hollenbeck

Case Details

Full title:SHARU BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN HOLLENBECK, Respondent …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 5, 2015

Citations

616 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Wagner v. United States

Furthermore, Rosemond is not retroactively applicable on collateral review. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3); Bey…

Sterling v. United States

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision in an unpublished per curiam opinion, finding no reversible error.…