From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bevilacqua v. Club Azzurro, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2004
8 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-07803.

Decided June 28, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated June 17, 2003, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Benedict P. Morelli Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (David S. Ratner and Steven C. November of counsel), for appellants.

White McSpedon, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Denise P. Buckley of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, REINALDO E. RIVERA, ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff Nicola Bevilacqua allegedly slipped and fell on a wet condition on the floor while exiting the card room at the defendant's social club. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs ( see Negri v. Stop Shop, 65 N.Y.2d 625, 626), we find that, after the defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiffs submitted evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant had constructive notice of the condition which allegedly caused the accident and was negligent in failing to remedy it ( see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837; Rockowitz v. City of New York, 255 A.D.2d 434; Rafael-Sharaf v. Waldbaum's, Inc, 238 A.D.2d 328; De Chirico v. Waldbaum, Inc., 227 A.D.2d 371, 372; Huth v. Allied Maintenance Corp, 143 A.D.2d 634, 635-636). A triable issue of fact exists as to whether the wet condition on the floor of the defendant's social club existed for a sufficient length of time before the accident to permit the defendant to discover and eliminate it ( see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, supra at 837).

S. MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, RIVERA and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bevilacqua v. Club Azzurro, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2004
8 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Bevilacqua v. Club Azzurro, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NICOLA BEVILACQUA, ET AL., appellants, v. CLUB AZZURRO, INC., respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 890

Citing Cases

Newman v. Edison Co.

On its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant third-party plaintiff established…

Bracco v. Puntillo Limited Partnership

To be entitled to judgment as a matter of law pursuant to CPLR 4401, a defendant has the burden of…