From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Betts v. Tsitiridis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2019
171 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9036-9037N Index 100425/18

04-18-2019

Anna BETTS, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Savas TSITIRIDIS, et al., Defendants–Respondents, 1617A, LLC, Defendant.

Finkelstein Law Group, PLLC, Syosset (Stuart Finkelstein of counsel), for appellant. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf LLP, Brooklyn (Thomas Torto of counsel), for respondents.


Finkelstein Law Group, PLLC, Syosset (Stuart Finkelstein of counsel), for appellant.

Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf LLP, Brooklyn (Thomas Torto of counsel), for respondents.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Kahn, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Adam Silvera, J.), entered August 20, 2018, which sua sponte vacated an order, same court and Justice, entered July 11, 2018, granting plaintiff's motion for a default judgment as against defendants Savas Tsitiridis, Central Hacking Corp., Ionut Patroi, and United Taxi Management Group, Inc., unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the order entered July 11, 2018 reinstated.

While an order entered sua sponte is not appealable as of right ( Sholes v. Meagher, 100 N.Y.2d 333, 335, 763 N.Y.S.2d 522, 794 N.E.2d 664 [2003] ), given the lack of evidence of the timeliness of the service of the answer and given the motion court's failure to identify a legal basis for vacating the prior order, we deem the notice of appeal a motion for leave to appeal, and grant leave (see e.g. Ray v. Chen, 148 A.D.3d 568, 50 N.Y.S.3d 62 [1st Dept. 2017] ).

The court exceeded its authority in sua sponte vacating the prior order granting plaintiff's motion for a default judgment (see Kiker v. Nassau County, 85 N.Y.2d 879, 881, 626 N.Y.S.2d 55, 649 N.E.2d 1199 [1995] ; Howell v. City of New York, 165 A.D.3d 567, 86 N.Y.S.3d 57 [1st Dept. 2018] ). In the absence of a motion or other request for relief from the order, the court's discretion to correct the order was limited to curing any mistake, defect or irregularity "not affecting a substantial right of a party" ( CPLR 5019[a] ).


Summaries of

Betts v. Tsitiridis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2019
171 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Betts v. Tsitiridis

Case Details

Full title:Anna Betts, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Savas Tsitiridis, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2019

Citations

171 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
171 A.D.3d 573
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 2970

Citing Cases

Justicebacker Inc. v. Abeles

A. Wolk's Motion for Correction Pursuant to CPLR 5019 Pursuant to CPLR 5019, courts "have the discretion to…

Heasley v. New York-Presbyterian

CPLR 5019(a) provides trial courts with the discretion to correct, "any mistake, defect or irregularity in…